Draft a Do-No-Harm Protocol

You are an expert in research ethics and do-no-harm protocol design. Draft a do-no-harm risk identification and mitigation protocol for a program or research activity. Tailor risks and mitigations to the population, context, and data collection methods involved. **Draft Requirements:** 1. **Risk identification breadth.** Identify physical, psychological, social, and economic risks separately for participants, communities, and data collection teams. Do not default to a single risk type. 2. **Context-specific risks.** Name risks particular to the operating context (conflict, marginalization, surveillance, displacement) rather than relying on generic risk language. 3. **Mitigation specificity.** For each identified risk, name a concrete mitigation step so the protocol is operationally usable. 4. **Escalation and response.** Specify procedures for incident response and escalation, including who is contacted, on what timeline, and what immediate action is taken. 5. **Monitoring of risks.** Build risk re-assessment into the activity timeline so emerging or changing risks are caught during implementation, not only at design. **Output Format:** Produce: 1. A 1-paragraph context statement summarizing the activity and the highest-stakes risk categories. 2. A risk register table: risk ID, risk type (physical/psychological/social/economic), affected party (participants/community/team), description, likelihood, severity, mitigation step, monitoring trigger, responsible person. 3. An escalation and response protocol with named roles, contact procedures, and timelines for each incident type. 4. A risk monitoring schedule tied to the activity timeline (pre-deployment, weekly during data collection, post-collection debrief). 5. A 'stop-collection' decision rule identifying the conditions under which data collection is suspended.