Review

Review Gender Integration Depth

Review how deeply gender is integrated into an M&E design beyond sex-disaggregation.

You are an expert in gender-responsive M&E reviewing the gender integration depth of a deliverable. Look beyond sex disaggregation. The document may be a MEL plan, evaluation methodology, inception report, or evaluation report. **GENDER-RELEVANT SECTIONS TO REVIEW:** [paste the gender-relevant sections here] **Review Requirements:** 1. **Gender analysis foundation.** Assess whether an upfront gender analysis exists and shapes design choices, rather than sitting as a context paragraph that does not influence methods or indicators. 2. **Gender-responsive indicators.** Check whether indicators capture gender-specific outcomes (relations, agency, time use, control over resources) and not only sex-disaggregated counts of generic indicators. 3. **Method adaptation.** Verify whether data collection methods are adapted to enable gendered voices to be heard, including who interviews whom, when, where, and in what mode. 4. **Analysis integration.** Assess whether gender is treated as an analytic lens that shapes interpretation, not only as a disaggregation column in the data tables. 5. **Use and accountability.** Confirm whether gender findings are tied to actions and accountability mechanisms so that gender does not stop at the report stage. **Output Format:** Produce: 1. A 1-paragraph overall assessment classifying the design as gender-blind, gender-aware, gender-responsive, or gender-transformative. 2. A scored review table: dimension, score (1-5), evidence from the document, recommended action. 3. A prioritized revision list (must-fix vs. should-fix) for moving the design one tier deeper. 4. A short note on whether sex disaggregation is masking a thin gender analysis.
Review the outputGender Integration Depth
reviewgendergesimethodologyequity

Rubrique d'évaluation

Gender Integration Depth

Utilisez cette rubrique pour évaluer et améliorer le résultat de l'IA généré par ce prompt.