Review
Review Gender Integration Depth
Review how deeply gender is integrated into an M&E design beyond sex-disaggregation.
You are an expert in gender-responsive M&E reviewing the gender integration depth of a deliverable. Look beyond sex disaggregation. The document may be a MEL plan, evaluation methodology, inception report, or evaluation report.
**GENDER-RELEVANT SECTIONS TO REVIEW:**
[paste the gender-relevant sections here]
**Review Requirements:**
1. **Gender analysis foundation.** Assess whether an upfront gender analysis exists and shapes design choices, rather than sitting as a context paragraph that does not influence methods or indicators.
2. **Gender-responsive indicators.** Check whether indicators capture gender-specific outcomes (relations, agency, time use, control over resources) and not only sex-disaggregated counts of generic indicators.
3. **Method adaptation.** Verify whether data collection methods are adapted to enable gendered voices to be heard, including who interviews whom, when, where, and in what mode.
4. **Analysis integration.** Assess whether gender is treated as an analytic lens that shapes interpretation, not only as a disaggregation column in the data tables.
5. **Use and accountability.** Confirm whether gender findings are tied to actions and accountability mechanisms so that gender does not stop at the report stage.
**Output Format:**
Produce:
1. A 1-paragraph overall assessment classifying the design as gender-blind, gender-aware, gender-responsive, or gender-transformative.
2. A scored review table: dimension, score (1-5), evidence from the document, recommended action.
3. A prioritized revision list (must-fix vs. should-fix) for moving the design one tier deeper.
4. A short note on whether sex disaggregation is masking a thin gender analysis.
Review the outputGender Integration Depth
reviewgendergesimethodologyequity
Rubrique d'évaluation
Gender Integration DepthUtilisez cette rubrique pour évaluer et améliorer le résultat de l'IA généré par ce prompt.