Skip to main content
M&E Studio
AI for M&E
AI How-TosPromptsRubricsPlaybooksPluginsSkills
Indicators
Workflows
M&E Resources
M&E MethodsReference LibraryProposal Help
About
Services
FR — FrançaisES — Español
M&E Studio

AI for M&E. Built for the work you're already doing.

AI for M&E

  • AI How-Tos
  • Prompts
  • Playbooks
  • Plugins
  • Indicators
  • Workflows

M&E Resources

  • M&E Methods
  • Reference Library
  • Decision Guides
  • Tools
  • Courses

Company

  • About
  • Mission
  • Services
  • Contact
  • LinkedIn

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility

© 2026 Logic Lab LLC. All rights reserved.

  1. M&E Library
  2. /
  3. SROI (Social Return on Investment)

SROI (Social Return on Investment)

Evaluation framework that assigns monetary values to social outcomes to calculate return on investment.

Also known as: social return, monetised impact, social value, SROI analysis

Definition

Social Return on Investment (SROI) is an evaluation framework that assigns monetary values to social, environmental, and economic outcomes to calculate how much social value is created per unit of investment. A SROI ratio of 3:1, for example, means every dollar invested generates three dollars of social value. SROI monetises outcomes by assigning proxy financial values to changes: if a job training program places participants in employment, SROI calculates the economic value of that employment; if a health program prevents disease, SROI calculates the value of prevented healthcare costs and productivity gains. SROI is used to communicate program impact to donors, policymakers, and investors in financial language they understand.

Why It Matters

Demonstrating the social value of programs is critical for funding and policy influence. But social outcomes (children educated, lives saved, women empowered) are hard to compare across programs or advocate with. SROI translates these outcomes into a single financial metric, making comparison and communication easier. A donor considering whether to fund five different programs can compare their SROI ratios to see which generates the most value per dollar. Policymakers considering investment in violence prevention can compare SROI to other public investments. However, SROI is controversial. Assigning monetary values to human outcomes (How much is a prevented suicide worth? How do you value improved wellbeing?) involves assumptions that may oversimplify or distort. SROI works best as one of several evaluation approaches, not as the sole measure of program value.

In Practice

An education program shows: 500 adolescents completed vocational training, 350 found employment, with annual earnings averaging $2,500 per person. The program's total cost was $125,000. SROI calculates: social value of employment = 350 people × $2,500 × 10 years of earnings = $8.75 million (using conservative lifetime projection). SROI ratio = $8.75M / $125K = 70:1. The program generated 70 dollars of economic value per dollar invested. A mental health program prevents 50 suicides per year (using prevention rates from evidence). Using standard cost-of-life values, prevented suicides = 50 × $1 million average human lifetime value = $50M value. Total program cost = $5M. SROI = 10:1. These ratios are compelling for funders, though they rest on assumptions (lifetime employment, suicide prevention attribution, proxy values) that should be transparent.

Related Topics

  • Value for Money: Broader assessment of program efficiency and effectiveness beyond financial metrics
  • Contribution Analysis: Method for establishing whether and how a program contributed to outcomes
  • Impact Evaluation: Rigorous assessment of outcomes and attributable impact
  • Evaluation Criteria (DAC): Framework for judging program relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability

At a Glance

Communicate social program value in financial terms familiar to funders and policymakers

Best For

  • Making case for social investment to funders
  • Comparing return across different programs or approaches
  • Advocacy and policy influence

Related Topics

Overview
Value for Money
The optimal balance of cost, quality, and outcomes, achieving the best results for the resources invested, assessed through the 4Es: economy, efficiency, effectiveness, and equity.
In-Depth Guide
Contribution Analysis
A structured approach to building a credible case for how and why a program contributed to observed outcomes, without requiring experimental attribution.
In-Depth Guide
Impact Evaluation
A rigorous evaluation approach that measures the causal effect of a program on outcomes by comparing what happened with what would have happened in its absence.
Overview
Evaluation Criteria (DAC)
The OECD-DAC framework provides five standard criteria, relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact, and sustainability, for systematically assessing the merit and value of development interventions.
PreviousReliabilityNextStatistical Significance