M&E concepts, methods, and frameworks
A searchable wiki with 150+ entries covering the M&E fundamentals, from theory of change to disaggregation.
The indicators, definitions, templates, and reference materials every M&E team rebuilds from scratch. Already done. Free to use.
Two starting points, so nothing here begins on a blank page.
A searchable wiki with 150+ entries covering the M&E fundamentals, from theory of change to disaggregation.
Clear comparisons and decision frameworks for the trade-offs M&E teams hit most often, grouped by hub.
3,900+ curated indicators across 18 sectors, 3 languages.
OpenDecision guides, AI prompts, and vocabulary for proposal writing.
OpenStep-by-step AI workflows for every major M&E task.
OpenReady-to-use templates and checklists in Word, Excel, and PDF.
OpenThree common starting points, each with a short sequence to follow.
Path 01 · New to M&E
Path 02 · Writing a proposal
Path 03 · Using AI
Fresh entries, decision guides, and playbooks from across the library.
A structured matrix that summarizes a project's design, linking activities to expected results through a clear hierarchy of objectives with indicators, verification sources, and assumptions.
A participatory qualitative monitoring approach that systematically collects and selects stories of change to identify and share the most significant outcomes of a program.
A retrospective evaluation approach that identifies, verifies, and analyses outcomes that have occurred, then determines whether and how the program contributed to them.
A structured collection of indicators organized by results level that tracks program performance across a portfolio, focusing on what changed rather than what was delivered.
A structured explanation of how and why a set of activities is expected to lead to desired outcomes, mapping the causal logic from inputs to impact.
An evaluation approach where every design decision is driven by the needs of the primary intended users, the specific people who will actually use the findings to make specific decisions.
A management approach that uses continuous learning from monitoring and evaluation data to adjust program strategies and activities in response to changing evidence or context.
A systematic process for verifying that collected data meets five quality dimensions, Validity, Integrity, Precision, Reliability, and Timeliness, ensuring data is fit for decision-making.
The breakdown of aggregate data by sub-group characteristics, such as sex, age, location, or vulnerability status, to reveal inequities and differences in program reach and outcomes.