Skip to main content
M&E Studio
AI for M&E
Where AI FitsAI How-TosPromptsRubricsPlaybooksPluginsSkills
Indicators
M&E Resources
M&E MethodsReference LibraryDecision GuidesToolsProposal Help
Services
AI Advisory for M&EM&E System DesignM&E System StrengtheningCustom Workflow AutomationHow We BuildTalk to us
About
FR · FrançaisES · Español
M&E Studio

AI for M&E. Built for the work you're already doing.

AI for M&E

  • Where AI Fits
  • AI How-Tos
  • Prompts
  • Rubrics
  • Playbooks
  • Plugins
  • Skills

M&E Resources

  • M&E Methods
  • Reference Library
  • Decision Guides
  • Tools
  • Proposal Help
  • Indicators
  • Workflows

Company

  • Services
  • About
  • Contact
  • Mission
  • LinkedIn

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility

© 2026 Logic Lab LLC. Free content: use and share with credit and a link; do not republish whole pages. Terms and content use

  1. M&E Library
  2. Data Collection
  3. Key Informant Interviews (KII): Meaning, Method and When to Use Them

Key Informant Interviews (KII): Meaning, Method and When to Use Them

In-depth, semi-structured interviews with individuals selected for their specific knowledge, experience, or perspectives relevant to the evaluation questions.

EmailLinkedInWhatsApp
On this page
  1. 1When are key informant interviews the right method?
  2. 2How It Works
  3. 3Key Components
  4. 4Best Practices
  5. 5Common Mistakes
  6. 6Examples

Further Reading

Whose Voices? Whose Knowledge? A Feminist Analysis of the Value of Key Informant InterviewsInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2021The Key Informant Technique in Qualitative ResearchSAGE Publications, 2014Key InformantThe SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2008Key Informant Interviews and Focus GroupsNursing Research Using Data Analysis, 2014
Also known as

KII, expert interviews, semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews

When are key informant interviews the right method?

Key informant interviews (KIIs) are the right method when you need to understand context, mechanisms, perceptions, or decision-making processes that structured questionnaires cannot capture. Use them when:

  • Explanatory depth is needed: survey data shows what happened; KIIs explain why
  • Specific knowledge holders must be reached: government officials, program managers, community leaders, technical specialists, or service providers who hold unique perspectives
  • Triangulation is required: KIIs complement quantitative data by providing explanatory context and validating or challenging survey findings
  • Rapid assessment timelines: KIIs can be designed and conducted in days, making them well-suited to rapid assessments, situational analyses, and emergency contexts

KIIs are not appropriate for collecting data that should be statistically representative (use surveys), for group dynamics or community-level perspectives (use focus group discussions), or for direct observation of behavior (use observation methods).

How It Works

Step 1: Define the purpose and key informant types

What specific information do you need, and who holds it? Identify the types of informants: program staff (implementation perspective), community leaders (community perspective), service providers (delivery perspective), government officials (policy perspective), beneficiaries (experience perspective). Aim for diversity across perspective types.

Step 2: Develop the interview guide

Write a semi-structured guide with 5-10 open-ended question areas (not scripts). Organize from general to specific. Ensure each question area maps to an evaluation question. Include probes for follow-up. The guide should be a reference, not a rigid script - follow where the interview leads.

Step 3: Select informants purposively

Purposive sampling is standard for KIIs: select individuals because of their specific knowledge or position, not randomly. Aim for 20-40 informants for most evaluations, targeting saturation - when new interviews are producing no new themes.

Step 4: Conduct the interviews

Use a two-person team where possible: one interviewer, one notetaker. Record with consent. Build rapport before sensitive questions. Use active listening, silence, and probes to draw out depth.

Step 5: Analyze thematically

Organize notes or transcripts by theme, not by interview. Look for patterns, contradictions, and outliers. Compare findings across informant types.

Step 6: Triangulate with other data sources

KII findings should be triangulated with survey data, document review, and (where applicable) focus group discussions before conclusions are drawn. No single KII finding should drive a major conclusion without corroboration.

Key Components

  • Interview guide: 5-10 open-ended question areas with probes, organized by theme
  • Informant typology: a defined set of informant roles to be covered, with rationale
  • Sampling matrix: tracking which informant types have been interviewed and ensuring diversity
  • Note-taking protocol: standardised approach to capturing verbatim quotes and observations
  • Analysis framework: a thematic coding structure aligned to evaluation questions
  • Triangulation matrix: tracking how KII findings compare to other data sources

Best Practices

Use semi-structured, not structured. Fully scripted interviews produce survey-quality data through an inefficient method. The value of KIIs comes from following unexpected threads. Keep the guide as a reference, not a constraint.

Prioritize listening over talking. Interviewers who fill silences with more questions get less data. Silence prompts elaboration. Restate, don't redirect.

Record with consent, transcribe selectively. Full transcription of all interviews is expensive and rarely necessary. Transcribe verbatim only key passages; use detailed notes for the rest.

Include data quality checks. If a finding appears in only one interview and contradicts all other data, treat it with caution. Note it as an outlier, not a conclusion.

Debrief after each interview. Immediately after each interview, the team should spend 10 minutes noting key findings, surprises, and follow-up questions. This debriefing captures context that does not appear in notes and guides the next interview.

Common Mistakes

Over-relying on official informants. Program managers and government officials are easy to reach but may give politically safe rather than candid responses. Balance official perspectives with community-level informants.

Leading questions. "Would you agree that the program improved access?" is a leading question. "How has access changed since the program started?" is not. Poor question design in KIIs produces confirmation bias, not evidence.

No analysis framework. Analyzing KII data without a structure ("just reading the notes") produces vague, anecdotal findings. Use a thematic coding framework aligned to evaluation questions.

Treating KII as substitute for survey. KIIs provide depth, not representation. Findings from 25 interviews cannot be extrapolated to a population of 10,000. Present findings as perspectives, not statistics.

Examples

Mid-term review, West Africa. A donor-funded governance program in Ghana conducted 32 KIIs as part of its mid-term review, covering district officials, CSO representatives, community leaders, and program staff. The interviews revealed a mechanism not visible in monitoring data: the program's most effective activities were those where district officials participated as co-facilitators rather than passive recipients. This finding informed a design revision for Phase 2.

Rapid assessment, East Africa. Following a drought in the Horn of Africa, an OCHA-funded team conducted 15 KIIs with local government, NGO staff, and community leaders over 3 days to assess the most critical gaps in the humanitarian response. KII findings were triangulated with observation data and secondary data from satellite imagery analysis. The combined assessment informed resource prioritisation for the following 30 days.

Last updated October 6, 2026First published March 3, 20264 sources checked

M&E Studio also does this work for clients.

The team that writes and reviews this library takes on M&E system design, evaluation quality reviews, AI advisory and workflow automation.

See services
Also known as

KII, expert interviews, semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews

Use a Prompt

Ready-made prompts for this topic. Open one, paste in your material, and run.

Design an Interview GuideReview a KII GuideReview KII Question Design
See all prompts

Linked Indicators

19 indicators across 3 donor frameworks

  • Number of key informant types represented in the interview sample
  • Proportion of interviews with notes or recordings enabling triangulation
  • Degree to which KII findings confirm or contradict quantitative data
Browse the indicator library

Decision Guides

Surveys vs Interviews vs Focus GroupsThe three most common M&E data collection methods, compared. Surveys tell you how many, interviews tell you why, focus groups tell you what people agree on.

Related Topics

Focus Group DiscussionsA qualitative data collection method that brings together 6-10 participants to discuss a specific topic, generating rich insights through group interaction and shared experiences.Survey DesignThe process of designing structured questionnaires and survey protocols to collect reliable, valid, and actionable data from a defined population.Observation Methods: Collecting Data by Watching What Actually HappensA systematic approach to collecting data by directly watching and recording behaviors, interactions, and processes as they occur in natural settings.Qualitative DataNon-numerical information captured through words, images, or observations that reveals the how and why behind program outcomes, providing depth and context to quantitative findings.Mixed Methods EvaluationAn evaluation approach that systematically combines quantitative and qualitative data to provide a more complete understanding of program effects, mechanisms, and context.Data Quality AssuranceA systematic process for verifying that collected data meets five quality dimensions, Validity, Integrity, Precision, Reliability, and Timeliness, ensuring data is fit for decision-making.Rapid Assessment: Getting Usable Findings When Time Is ShortA condensed data collection approach designed to generate actionable insights quickly, typically using streamlined qualitative and quantitative methods in time-constrained contexts.

Further Reading

Whose Voices? Whose Knowledge? A Feminist Analysis of the Value of Key Informant InterviewsInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2021The Key Informant Technique in Qualitative ResearchSAGE Publications, 2014Key InformantThe SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2008Key Informant Interviews and Focus GroupsNursing Research Using Data Analysis, 2014

Browse the M&E Library

164 entries across 8 categories

Data Collection

All 15 entries →
  • Baseline Design
  • Census vs Sample: When to Use Each in M&E
  • Cluster Sampling
  • Data Collection Burden
  • Data Management
  • Data Quality Assurance
  • Focus Group Discussions
  • Key Informant Interviews (KII): Meaning, Method and When to Use Them · You are here
  • Midline
  • Observation Methods: Collecting Data by Watching What Actually Happens
  • Purposive Sampling
  • Qualitative Data
  • Quantitative Data
  • Sampling Methods
  • Survey Design
Previous in Data CollectionFocus Group DiscussionsNext in Data CollectionMidline