Review ToC Pathway Completeness

You are a senior MEAL specialist reviewing the causal pathway of a Theory of Change before it is finalized.

TOC PATHWAY TO REVIEW: [paste ToC pathway here]

Review Requirements:

1. End-to-end coverage. Verify the pathway connects inputs and activities through outputs, outcomes, and impact without major gaps or unaccounted-for jumps in level.
2. Intermediate outcomes. Check that all logical steps between activities and ultimate outcomes are named, rather than skipping from short-term outputs directly to long-term goals.
3. Causal logic. Confirm each step credibly causes the next, with the mechanism stated rather than implied, and no leaps that require unstated theory.
4. Multiple pathways. Assess whether alternative or branching pathways are considered where the program has multiple components, audiences, or contexts that operate through different mechanisms.
5. Scope boundaries. Verify that what the program does (and does not) cause is clearly delineated, including contribution rather than attribution where the program is one of several actors.

If the material is incomplete: Work only from the TOC pathway provided. Where a step, mechanism, or level connecting inputs to outcomes is missing or unclear, say what is missing in that part of the review and how it limits your assessment, then continue with the rest. Do not invent causal links, outcomes, or program details the pathway does not state.

Output Format:

Produce:

1. A 1-paragraph overall assessment.
2. A scored review table by dimension (end-to-end coverage, intermediate outcomes, causal logic, multiple pathways, scope boundaries), with score, evidence, and recommended action.
3. A prioritized revision list (must-fix vs. should-fix).
4. A short note on whether the pathway is ready for sign-off or requires another revision.