Create a Data Protection Impact Assessment
Create a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for an M&E data system covering data flows, privacy risks, legal basis, and mitigation measures aligned with GDPR and humanitarian data protection standards.
Fill In Your Details (10 Blanks)
Add your information to get a tailored prompt. You can also use it as is.
Sector and Donor Context (Optional)
Your Prompt (With Your Details)
This is the complete prompt, ready to copy and paste.
You are a senior MEAL specialist with expertise in data protection, privacy law, and humanitarian data management. Your task is to create a comprehensive Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for an M&E data system.
Context:
- System/activity name: the M&E data system being assessed
- Organization: an organization implementing the program
- Program: the associated program
- Data subjects: the individuals whose data the system holds
- Types of personal data collected: the categories of personal data involved
- Special category data: health, disability, ethnicity, or protection-related data, if collected
- Technology used: the technology platforms involved in collecting, storing, and processing the data
- Data sharing partners: the organizations or entities the data is shared with
- Applicable legal frameworks: the relevant data protection laws and policies
Deliverables:
1. System Description
- Purpose of data processing (why this data is collected and how it supports program objectives)
- Scope of data processing (what data, about whom, in what volume)
- Data lifecycle: collection, transfer, storage, use, sharing, archival, deletion
- Data flow diagram (text format) covering: collection points, transfer methods, storage locations, processing activities, sharing points, and deletion/archival endpoints
2. Legal Basis for Processing For each category of data, identify the legal basis:
| Data Category | Legal Basis (GDPR Article) | Justification | Conditions/Limitations |
|---|
Relevant GDPR bases include: consent (Art. 6(1)(a), noting humanitarian power dynamics), legitimate interest (Art. 6(1)(f) with balancing test), vital interests (Art. 6(1)(d)), public interest (Art. 6(1)(e)), and for special category data: explicit consent (Art. 9(2)(a)) or substantial public interest (Art. 9(2)(g)). Address whether consent is truly freely given when beneficiaries depend on the organization for services.
3. Privacy Risk Assessment Identify and assess at least 12 privacy risks:
| # | Risk | Description | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Risk Score | Affected Rights |
|---|
Risk categories must include at minimum: unauthorized access, data breach (device theft, server compromise), excessive collection, purpose creep, sharing risks (e.g., partner data used for immigration enforcement), re-identification from anonymized data, inaccuracy, retention beyond schedule, cross-border transfer, automated decision-making, surveillance risk, and additional risks for vulnerable populations (refugees, minors, GBV survivors).
4. Mitigation Measures For each identified risk, provide specific technical and organizational measures:
| Risk # | Mitigation Measure | Type (Technical/Organizational/Legal) | Responsible | Implementation Timeline | Residual Risk |
|---|
Measures should include: data minimization with field-level justification; role-based access controls with audit logs; encryption (AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit); pseudonymization; retention schedules with deletion; data sharing agreements; breach notification (72-hour GDPR window); security audits; staff data protection training; physical device security.
5. Data Subject Rights Document how each right is fulfilled (how exercised, response timeline, responsible party, exceptions) for: Access, Rectification, Erasure, Restriction, Portability, Objection, and rights related to automated decision-making. Address how beneficiaries with limited literacy or connectivity can exercise these rights in practice.
6. Consultation Document internal stakeholders consulted (IT, legal, program, safeguarding) and any external consultation (data protection authority, community representatives), and how their input shaped the assessment.
7. DPIA Outcome Provide an overall risk rating (High/Medium/Low) with justification, a recommendation to proceed, proceed with conditions, or not proceed, and an annual review schedule. Requires sign-off from a Data Protection Officer or equivalent and senior management.
Align with GDPR Article 35, ICRC Handbook on Data Protection in Humanitarian Action, OCHA Data Responsibility Guidelines, and the Humanitarian Data Exchange (HDX) standards.
This prompt may involve sensitive data. Do not paste personally identifiable information (PII) or protection-sensitive data into AI tools. Use anonymized or aggregated data only.