Skip to main content
M&E Studio
Prompts
Indicators
AI for M&E
RubricsPlugins and Skills
M&E Resources
M&E GuidesReference LibraryTools
Services
AI Advisory for M&EWorkflowsAboutContact Us
FR · FrançaisES · Español
MeStudio
MeStudio
monitoringevaluationstudio.com/resources/reference/process-evaluation

From M&E Studio · monitoringevaluationstudio.com/resources/reference/process-evaluation · free to use with credit

M&E Studio

Rigorous M&E, Made Easier.
AI where it helps. Judgment where it matters.

AI for M&E

  • AI for M&E
  • Prompts
  • Rubrics
  • Plugins and Skills

M&E Resources

  • M&E Guides
  • Reference Library
  • Tools
  • Indicators

Company

  • Services
  • Workflows
  • About
  • Contact
  • Mission
  • LinkedIn

Legal

  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility

© 2026 Logic Lab LLC. Free content: use and share with credit and a link; do not republish whole pages. Terms and content use

  1. M&E Library
  2. Evaluation
  3. Process Evaluation: What It Is and How to Conduct One

Process Evaluation: What It Is and How to Conduct One

On This Page
  1. 1What Is a Process Evaluation?
  2. 2Why Does Process Evaluation Matter?
  3. 3How Do You Conduct a Process Evaluation?

On This Page

  1. 1What Is a Process Evaluation?
  2. 2Why Does Process Evaluation Matter?
  3. 3How Do You Conduct a Process Evaluation?
Also known as

implementation evaluation, formative evaluation, process study

What Is a Process Evaluation?

A process evaluation (also called implementation or formative evaluation) assesses how a program is being delivered. It examines whether activities are being implemented as planned, reaching the intended beneficiaries, at the intended quality, and with intended frequency. Process evaluation answers "Is the program working as designed?" rather than "Is the program creating results?" It focuses on understanding implementation fidelity, identifying barriers and facilitators, and generating learning to improve delivery. Process evaluations are typically conducted during implementation, often repeatedly at multiple points.

Why Does Process Evaluation Matter?

Many programs fail to achieve results not because their theory is wrong, but because implementation is weak or inconsistent. Process evaluation detects these gaps early, when adjustments can still be made. It builds team understanding of what is working and what is not, enabling responsive management and problem-solving. Process evaluation is particularly valuable in complex contexts, with new program models, or when implementation partners are learning to deliver quality activities. It bridges monitoring data (which tracks outputs delivered) and impact data (which measures outcomes achieved), explaining why results fell short or exceeded expectations.

How Do You Conduct a Process Evaluation?

A financial literacy program might conduct a process evaluation after six months that examines: Are training sessions being held at planned frequency and duration? Are the right facilitators delivering content? Are the intended beneficiaries participating? Are materials being taught in the intended sequence and depth? Are participants engaged? A process evaluation might find that classes are occurring but attendance is irregular, or that facilitators are skipping certain modules due to time pressure. This information would lead to adjustments - perhaps shorter modules, support for attendance barriers, or revised scheduling. Process evaluation uses qualitative methods (interviews, observation), quantitative monitoring data (attendance records, fidelity checklists), and program theory to examine implementation quality.

Last updated October 6, 2026First published March 3, 2026

M&E Studio also does this work for clients.

The team that writes and reviews this library takes on M&E system design, evaluation quality reviews, AI advisory and workflow automation.

See services
Also known as

implementation evaluation, formative evaluation, process study

M&E Studio Resources

Create an Adaptive Management PlanSee all prompts

Related Topics

Adaptive ManagementA management approach that uses continuous learning from monitoring and evaluation data to adjust program strategies and activities in response to changing evidence or context.Theory of ChangeA structured explanation of how and why a set of activities is expected to lead to desired outcomes, mapping the causal logic from inputs to impact.OECD DAC Evaluation Criteria: Relevance, Coherence, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact, SustainabilityThe OECD-DAC framework provides six standard criteria, relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability, for systematically assessing the merit and value of development interventions.Contribution Analysis: Building a Credible Case Without a Control GroupA structured approach to building a credible case for how and why a program contributed to observed outcomes, without requiring experimental attribution.Monitoring vs Evaluation: Key Differences ExplainedMonitoring tracks program progress continuously; evaluation assesses outcomes and impact periodically.Formative EvaluationEvaluation conducted during program implementation to inform improvement, answering what is working, what needs to change, and how the program can deliver better.

Browse the M&E Library

164 entries across 8 categories

Evaluation

All 28 entries →
  • Accountability Evaluation
  • Audit Evaluation
  • Audit vs Evaluation
  • Compliance Evaluation
  • Compliance Monitoring
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • Evaluability Assessment
  • Evaluation Matrix: Linking Each Question to Its Data Sources and Methods
  • Evaluation Questions
  • Evaluation Report: What It Is and What to Include
  • Evaluation Terms of Reference
  • Ex-Ante vs Ex-Post Evaluation: Meaning and Key Differences
  • Formative Evaluation
  • Formative vs Summative Evaluation
  • Inception Report: What It Is and What to Include
  • Management Response to an Evaluation: What It Is and What to Include
  • Meta-Evaluation
  • Mid-Term Review (MTR): What It Is and What to Include
  • Mixed Methods Evaluation
  • OECD DAC Evaluation Criteria: Relevance, Coherence, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact, Sustainability
  • Performance Evaluation
  • Process Evaluation: What It Is and How to Conduct One · You are here
  • Real-Time Evaluation: Feeding Findings Back During Implementation
  • Rubric-Based Assessment
  • Summative Evaluation
  • Sustainability Evaluation
  • Systematic Review
  • Theory-Based Evaluation
Previous in EvaluationPerformance EvaluationNext in EvaluationReal-Time Evaluation: Feeding Findings Back During Implementation