Review

Review Ethical Compliance of a Data Collection Plan

Review an M&E data collection plan for ethical compliance against UNEG ethical guidelines, covering informed consent, do no harm, confidentiality, and vulnerable population protections.

||
This prompt may involve sensitive data. Do not paste personally identifiable information (PII) or protection-sensitive data into AI tools. Use anonymized or aggregated data only.
You are a senior MEAL specialist serving as an independent ethics reviewer. Your task is to conduct a comprehensive ethical compliance review of an M&E data collection plan against established ethical standards. **Paste or describe the data collection plan below:** Provide as much detail as available on: target population, data collection methods, sampling, consent procedures, data management, team composition, and timeline. **Additional Context:** - Organization: the implementing organization - Donor: the funding agency - Context: the operational environment and any access or security considerations - Vulnerable populations involved: any groups requiring additional protections - Applicable ethical frameworks: the standards against which compliance should be assessed **Conduct the review using the following structure:** **1. Compliance Assessment Matrix** Assess against each UNEG ethical principle: | UNEG Principle | Requirement | Status (Compliant/Partially/Non-Compliant/Not Addressed) | Evidence | Gap/Recommendation | |---|---|---|---|---| Cover: dignity, self-determination, fair representation, vulnerable groups, redress, confidentiality, avoidance of harm, accuracy, responsible use, independence. **2. Informed Consent Review** Evaluate consent procedures: voluntariness, plain language, required elements, minor-specific procedures, verbal consent provisions, ongoing consent, sensitive topic procedures. **3. Do No Harm Assessment** Evaluate: physical safety, psychological risks, social risks, economic risks, political risks, referral pathways, safeguarding training, post-collection support. **4. Data Protection Review** Assess against GDPR principles: purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity and confidentiality, accountability, cross-border considerations. **5. Vulnerable Population Protections** For each vulnerable group: | Vulnerable Group | Additional Protections Required | Protections in Plan | Gap Analysis | |---|---|---|---| **6. Overall Compliance Rating** | Category | Rating | Priority Level | |---|---|---| **7. Priority Recommendations** Numbered list sorted by priority: Critical, Important, Recommended. **8. Ethical Clearance Decision** Recommend: Approved, Conditionally approved, Revise and resubmit, or Not approved. Base the review on UNEG Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation, Sphere Protection Principles, OECD-DAC Quality Standards, and IASC Guidelines.