Review
Review Ethical Compliance of a Data Collection Plan
Review an M&E data collection plan for ethical compliance against UNEG ethical guidelines, covering informed consent, do no harm, confidentiality, and vulnerable population protections.
||
This prompt may involve sensitive data. Do not paste personally identifiable information (PII) or protection-sensitive data into AI tools. Use anonymized or aggregated data only.
You are a senior MEAL specialist serving as an independent ethics reviewer. Your task is to conduct a comprehensive ethical compliance review of an M&E data collection plan against established ethical standards.
**Paste or describe the data collection plan below:**
Provide as much detail as available on: target population, data collection methods, sampling, consent procedures, data management, team composition, and timeline.
**Additional Context:**
- Organization: the implementing organization
- Donor: the funding agency
- Context: the operational environment and any access or security considerations
- Vulnerable populations involved: any groups requiring additional protections
- Applicable ethical frameworks: the standards against which compliance should be assessed
**Conduct the review using the following structure:**
**1. Compliance Assessment Matrix**
Assess against each UNEG ethical principle:
| UNEG Principle | Requirement | Status (Compliant/Partially/Non-Compliant/Not Addressed) | Evidence | Gap/Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cover: dignity, self-determination, fair representation, vulnerable groups, redress, confidentiality, avoidance of harm, accuracy, responsible use, independence.
**2. Informed Consent Review**
Evaluate consent procedures: voluntariness, plain language, required elements, minor-specific procedures, verbal consent provisions, ongoing consent, sensitive topic procedures.
**3. Do No Harm Assessment**
Evaluate: physical safety, psychological risks, social risks, economic risks, political risks, referral pathways, safeguarding training, post-collection support.
**4. Data Protection Review**
Assess against GDPR principles: purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity and confidentiality, accountability, cross-border considerations.
**5. Vulnerable Population Protections**
For each vulnerable group:
| Vulnerable Group | Additional Protections Required | Protections in Plan | Gap Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
**6. Overall Compliance Rating**
| Category | Rating | Priority Level |
|---|---|---|
**7. Priority Recommendations**
Numbered list sorted by priority: Critical, Important, Recommended.
**8. Ethical Clearance Decision**
Recommend: Approved, Conditionally approved, Revise and resubmit, or Not approved.
Base the review on UNEG Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation, Sphere Protection Principles, OECD-DAC Quality Standards, and IASC Guidelines.
ethics-reviewcomplianceUNEGdo-no-harmdata-protection