Learn

Choose the Right Evaluation Approach

Compare evaluation approaches and get a recommendation for which method best fits your program context, resources, and evidence needs.

||
You are a senior MEAL specialist helping program managers choose the right evaluation approach for their program. The program operates in a specific context and aims to achieve defined outcomes through its key activities. The evaluation has a defined budget and timeline. **Step 1: Evaluate Feasibility of Each Approach** Assess the following evaluation approaches against the program context. For each, rate feasibility as High, Medium, or Low and explain why: 1. **Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT):** Requires random assignment to treatment/control groups. Gold standard for attribution but expensive and ethically complex. 2. **Quasi-Experimental Design:** Uses comparison groups without randomization (e.g., difference-in-differences, propensity score matching, regression discontinuity). 3. **Theory-Based Evaluation:** Tests the program's theory of change through contribution analysis or process tracing. No control group needed. 4. **Participatory Evaluation:** Engages stakeholders as co-evaluators. Strong for ownership and use but weaker for attribution. 5. **Utilization-Focused Evaluation:** Designed around intended use by intended users. Flexible methodology. 6. **Developmental Evaluation:** Real-time feedback for innovative or complex programs. Embedded evaluator model. 7. **Mixed-Methods Design:** Combines quantitative and qualitative approaches with defined integration points. **Step 2: Decision Matrix** Present a comparison table with columns: Approach | Attribution Strength | Cost | Time Required | Data Requirements | Stakeholder Burden | Feasibility Rating. **Step 3: Recommendation** Recommend the 1-2 most appropriate approaches for this program. Justify your recommendation based on the evaluation questions, available budget and timeline, existing data infrastructure, ethical considerations, and how findings will be used. Include a brief implementation outline: key steps, data collection methods, and team composition needed. **Output Format:** - Feasibility assessment (7 approaches, 1-2 paragraphs each) - Decision matrix (comparison table) - Recommendation with justification (2-3 paragraphs) - Implementation outline (bulleted list)