Design
Design a Mixed-Methods Evaluation
Design a mixed-methods evaluation with integration points, sequencing decisions, a methods matrix, and a plan for combining quantitative and qualitative strands.
||
You are a senior MEAL specialist with expertise in mixed-methods research design. Your task is to design a mixed-methods evaluation that addresses the program's core evaluation questions by combining quantitative and qualitative approaches.
The program operates across multiple sites over a multi-year implementation period. The evaluation needs to measure impact, explain variation, and understand how and why the program works.
**Develop the following components:**
1. **Mixed-Methods Design Selection:**
* Select and justify the mixed-methods design type. Choose from Creswell and Plano Clark's typology:
- Convergent parallel (QUAN + QUAL simultaneously)
- Explanatory sequential (QUAN followed by QUAL)
- Exploratory sequential (QUAL followed by QUAN)
- Embedded (one method nested within the other)
- Transformative (social justice framing)
- Multiphase (iterative over program lifecycle)
* Justify the choice based on evaluation questions, timeline, and resource constraints
* Specify the priority weighting (e.g., QUAN-dominant, QUAL-dominant, or equal)
* Visual notation diagram using Morse's notation system
2. **Methods Matrix:** Create a detailed matrix table with columns: Evaluation Question, Quantitative Method, Qualitative Method, Integration Point, and Expected Contribution. For each evaluation question, specify how the two strands will be integrated.
3. **Quantitative Strand Design:**
* Sampling strategy (probability sampling, with justification for sample size)
* Data collection instruments (survey design, administrative data extraction protocol)
* Analysis plan (descriptive statistics, inferential tests, regression models)
* Validity and reliability considerations
4. **Qualitative Strand Design:**
* Sampling strategy (purposive sampling, with case selection criteria)
* Data collection methods (interview guides, focus group protocols, observation frameworks)
* Analysis approach (thematic analysis, framework analysis, or case study analysis)
* Trustworthiness criteria (credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability)
5. **Integration Strategy:** Detail how quantitative and qualitative findings will be combined:
* **During data collection:** How one strand informs the other
* **During analysis:** Joint display tables, data transformation, case-oriented integration
* **During interpretation:** How to handle convergence, complementarity, and contradiction between strands
* **Meta-inferences:** How to draw conclusions that transcend what either method alone could provide
6. **Sequencing and Timeline:**
* Phase-by-phase timeline showing when each data collection activity occurs
* Decision points and integration workshops
* Reporting milestones
7. **Joint Display Template:** Create a template for presenting integrated findings with columns: Quantitative Finding, Qualitative Finding, Integration Assessment (convergent, complementary, contradictory), and Meta-Inference.
8. **Quality Criteria for Mixed-Methods:**
* Design quality (internal consistency, methodological rigor of each strand)
* Interpretive rigor (quality of meta-inferences, integration fidelity)
* Inference transferability
* Legitimation types addressed
**Output Format:**
Deliver all components as clearly labeled sections. The methods matrix and joint display template should be formatted as tables. Include the visual design notation and timeline as clearly described diagrams.
mixed-methodsintegrationcreswell-plano-clarkjoint-displaymeta-inferenceevaluation-designquan-qual