Analyze Food Security Monitoring Data
Analyze food security monitoring data to calculate severity classifications, identify trends and geographic hotspots, and generate response recommendations using standard indicators.
Fill In Your Details (7 Blanks)
Add your information to get a tailored prompt. You can also use it as is.
Sector and Donor Context (Optional)
Your Prompt (With Your Details)
This is the complete prompt, ready to copy and paste.
You are a senior MEAL specialist with expertise in food security analysis, IPC classification, and humanitarian response decision-making. Your task is to analyze food security monitoring data for a food security program.
Analysis Context:
- Program name: a food security program
- Data sources: outcome monitoring surveys, post-distribution monitoring, and market price data
- Time period: the reporting period under review
- Geographic scope: the areas covered by the program
- Number of households surveyed: a defined sample of households per survey round
- Current IPC classification: the area's current phase classification
Deliverables:
1. Food Security Severity Analysis Calculate and present the following for each survey round and geographic unit:
FCS Analysis:
- Distribution by category (Poor 0-21, Borderline 21.5-35, Acceptable >35) and mean FCS by zone, sex of household head, and household size
- Trend across rounds (improving, stable, deteriorating) and FCS-N analysis (poor vitamin A-rich, protein-rich, hem iron-rich food consumption)
Reduced Coping Strategy Index (rCSI) Analysis:
- Mean rCSI score by geographic unit and demographic group
- Distribution of individual coping strategies (percentage of households using each strategy, mean frequency)
- Trend analysis across rounds
- Correlation between rCSI and FCS to validate severity assessment
Household Hunger Scale (HHS) Analysis:
- Distribution by category: Little to no hunger (0-1), Moderate hunger (2-3), Severe hunger (4-6)
- Percentage of households experiencing severe hunger by zone
- Trend analysis and comparison to pre-crisis levels
Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) Analysis:
- Mean HDDS by zone and round
- Distribution by category: Low (0-4), Medium (5-8), High (9-12)
- Most commonly consumed and least commonly consumed food groups
- Seasonal patterns in dietary diversity
Present a consolidated severity summary:
| Zone | FCS % Poor+Borderline | Mean rCSI | HHS % Moderate+Severe | Mean HDDS | Severity Trend | Convergence Assessment |
|---|
2. Convergence of Evidence Analysis For each geographic unit, assess whether indicators converge or diverge:
- Do FCS, rCSI, HHS, and HDDS all point in the same direction?
- Where indicators diverge, explain likely reasons (e.g., rCSI improving while FCS stagnant may indicate exhaustion of coping strategies)
- Apply IPC convergence of evidence approach: classify each area as improving, stable, or deteriorating based on multiple indicators
3. Livelihood Coping Analysis Percentage of households employing LCSI stress/crisis/emergency strategies, trend direction (moving to more severe strategies?), asset depletion indicators (productive asset sales, school withdrawal, displacement), and cross-zone coping comparisons.
4. Market and Economic Analysis Staple food price trends (nominal and real); terms of trade (daily wage-to-staple ratio, livestock-to-cereals ratio); market functionality (availability, access, price volatility); impact on food access; and MEB tracking (current cost, trend, and transfer value adequacy implications).
5. Geographic and Demographic Hotspot Analysis Rank all geographic units by composite severity and identify the 3-5 critical hotspots needing intensified response. Identify the most vulnerable demographic subgroups. Produce a map-ready severity table (Zone, Composite Severity Score, Classification, Priority Rank, Key Vulnerability Factors).
6. IPC-Compatible Classification Classify each area using IPC-compatible analysis (Phase 1 Minimal through Phase 5 Famine, based on convergence of FCS, rCSI, HHS, and livelihood indicators). Provide population estimates per phase where denominators are available, and compare with the most recent official IPC classification.
7. Response Recommendations Present recommendations in a decision matrix (Zone, Current Phase, Projected Phase at 3 months, Recommended Action, Priority, Timeline). Address: immediate response adjustments (transfer values, distributions, modality changes), targeting refinements, seasonal preparedness and pre-positioning, graduation and transition readiness, and key data gaps and limitations.
Align analysis with IPC Technical Manual 3.1, WFP VAM analytical guidance, FEWS NET scenario development methodology, and SPHERE food security and nutrition standards.
If the material is incomplete: Work only from the food security and market data actually provided. If a data source, indicator, or time period needed for a calculation is missing, mark that figure or classification as not calculable, state which data is missing, and continue with the comparisons you can make. Do not invent survey values, IPC classifications, or price figures that are not in the data given.