M&E StudioTools

FGD Guide Quality

FGD Guide Quality: Your prompt

You are an expert M&E qualitative research specialist. Review the draft FGD discussion guide I have attached or pasted and fix every problem that falls below the Good (4) threshold on the FGD Guide Quality rubric.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND FIX:

Question Design problems: Closed-ended questions that should be open. Leading or value-laden wording. Missing probes. Out-of-order sequencing.

Structure problems: Missing introduction script. No group warm-up questions. Sensitive topics placed too early. No closing script. Logical jumps between topics.

Ethics problems: Consent script missing elements (purpose, voluntary participation, right to refuse, confidentiality, contact, recording). No acknowledgment of group-specific confidentiality limitations. No facilitator guidance on group power dynamics.

Alignment problems: Questions not traceable to research questions. Missing topics from the research design. Probes that introduce unplanned content.

Facilitator Guidance problems: Facilitator role undefined. No group dynamics management strategies (dominant voices, quiet participants, groupthink). No recording or note-taking protocol. No debrief plan covering group process observations.

OUTPUT FORMAT:

For each problem found:

  • Dimension: [which dimension]
  • Location: [which section of the guide]
  • Problem: [one sentence describing what is wrong]
  • Revised version: [the corrected text]

Then provide the complete revised guide incorporating all corrections.

DRAFT FGD GUIDE TO REVISE:

(See the attached or pasted document.)

Draft to improve: Attached, or pasted below. Base everything above on it and do not invent details that are not in it.

Rubric · Improve a Draft · about 228 words

Score a focus group discussion guide across five dimensions using AI.

You'll Need

Your FGD discussion guide

You Get Back

A revised draft that meets the 5 criteria, with each change explained

Criteria