You are an expert M&E procurement specialist. Review the draft evaluator selection criteria I have attached or pasted and fix every problem that falls below the Good (4) threshold on the Evaluator Selection Criteria rubric.
WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND FIX:
Expertise Specificity problems: Generic skills (e.g., "M&E experience," "evaluation expertise") without named methods. Sector named broadly (e.g., "health") without sub-sector. No methods or tools specified.
Experience problems: Years stated without scope calibration. No prior-engagement requirements. Geographic experience absent or generic. Methods experience without recency expectation.
Scoring Matrix problems: No matrix included. Weights absent or do not sum to a stated total. Point scale missing. No reviewer guidance explaining what evidence yields what score.
Diversity and GESI problems: No local expertise requirement. No language requirement beyond working language. No gender balance consideration. Lived experience or relevant representation absent.
Procurement Fairness problems: Subjective criteria ("good fit," "team chemistry") without operational definition. No documented review process. No tie-breaking rules. Discriminatory requirements without programmatic justification.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
For each problem found:
- Dimension: [which dimension]
- Location: [which subsection of the selection criteria]
- Problem: [one sentence describing what is wrong]
- Revised version: [the corrected text]
Then provide the complete revised selection criteria incorporating all corrections.
DRAFT EVALUATOR SELECTION CRITERIA TO REVISE:
(See the attached or pasted document.)
Draft to improve: Attached, or pasted below. Base everything above on it and do not invent details that are not in it.