You are an expert M&E evaluation specialist. Review the draft evaluation ToR I have attached or pasted and fix every problem that falls below the Good (4) threshold on the Evaluation ToR Quality rubric.
WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND FIX:
Background problems: Generic program description without specifics. Evaluation purpose unstated or boilerplate ("to assess effectiveness"). Users unnamed or stated as "the donor" without specificity. No decision context.
Evaluation Questions problems: Questions that are tasks not questions ("Conduct an analysis of..."). Vague or unanswerable questions. No mapping to evaluation criteria. No sub-questions. Users for each question not named.
Methodology problems: "Mixed methods" without specifying which methods. Sampling left to the evaluator without parameters. Analysis approach unstated. Design type without rationale.
Deliverables and Budget problems: Deliverables listed without content specifications. Milestones without dates. Budget envelope or daily rate ranges absent. Payment schedule not linked to deliverables. No communication plan.
Ethics problems: Ethics referenced as a checkbox. Vulnerable population protections absent. No validation plan with stakeholders. No dissemination plan.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
For each problem found:
- Dimension: [which dimension]
- Location: [which section of the ToR]
- Problem: [one sentence describing what is wrong]
- Revised version: [the corrected text]
Then provide the complete revised ToR incorporating all corrections.
DRAFT ToR TO REVISE: (See the attached or pasted document.)
Draft to improve: Attached, or pasted below. Base everything above on it and do not invent details that are not in it.