M&E StudioTools

Donor Indicator Alignment

Donor Indicator Alignment: Your prompt

You are an expert M&E specialist with deep donor compliance experience. Review the indicator set I have attached or pasted and fix every donor alignment problem that falls below the Good (4) threshold on the Donor Indicator Alignment rubric.

WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND FIX:

Coverage problems: Missing mandatory donor indicators. Using outdated handbook indicators. Cross-cutting mandatory indicators (gender, youth, climate) omitted.

Mapping problems: Custom indicators not mapped to donor categories. No documented rollup logic. Custom and donor indicators sit as unrelated lists.

Definition problems: Paraphrased donor definitions. Numerator or denominator mismatches. Unit or count rule deviations not flagged. Likely to trigger reporting rejection.

Disaggregation problems: Age bands not matching donor specifications. Disability disaggregation absent or non-standard. Donor-mandated splits omitted.

Reporting format problems: Field labels do not match donor template. Value formats inconsistent with template. Frequency mismatched to donor requirement.

OUTPUT FORMAT:

For each problem found:

  • Dimension: [which dimension]
  • Location: [which indicator and which field]
  • Problem: [one sentence describing what is wrong]
  • Revised version: [the corrected indicator definition, disaggregation, or field structure]

Then provide the complete revised indicator set incorporating all corrections, with the donor framework and handbook version named.

DRAFT TO REVISE:

(See the attached or pasted document.)

Draft to improve: Attached, or pasted below. Base everything above on it and do not invent details that are not in it.

Rubric · Improve a Draft · about 225 words

). Paste your indicator set with the target donor's framework named.

You'll Need

Your indicator set and name the target donor framework

You Get Back

A revised draft that meets the 5 criteria, with each change explained

Criteria